For this crit session we each analysed two people's work anonymously and our work was also analysed anonymously by two individuals with no verbal feedback or discussion taking place, the feedback was provided in a written format. The feedback came in the form of a series of answered questions about my work. After receiving two feedback sheets, this allowed me to gain two differing perspectives and two different opinions of my work, some points made were similar whilst other's differed largely in advice and criticism. The main concurrence about my work was that it worked really well and the fact it was anonymous meant I gained more honest feedback which was more supportive. I gained some interesting comments, many about the use of black and white and how they felt colour would have worked better. However I did earlier experiments with colour and from peer feedback at the time I decided to go with a more neutral appearance. Other feedback which came back was that I could experiment with the visibility of the text so show that this is also out of sight, or make it 'double vision' as though she is closing her eyes and seeing double. The most interesting feedback I gained was to experiment with mirroring the features on the 'image' piece and the 'type and image' piece, so that the series would make a complete face. This is really interesting and certainly something to work with. Here are my crit feedback from my 'Proverbally Yours' brief (21/10/11);
